I have read a very interesting post in webmasterworld about pros and const link buying
There are many oppinions. From the Search Engine point of view bought links skew the results when counted as they are not necessary relevant or “best” resources in terms of quality. However, the webmaster spend time (and money) to have them listed, thus the information should have at least some credability. Additionally, webmasters can “vote” for any site by linking to it.
I think that linking context is important and bought links should have less weight if they are not in context or not related to the original page content. Perhaps they have not be treated separatelly than other links, although I do not think that readers would follow links that are in the bottomline of the page often. So, in simple terms, bigger weight should have clearly seen page links with rich description. Site-wide, small-text links should be unrated/almost unrated. I think search industry is going in the same direction.
Latests posts
- Burn books, buy Kindle?
- How to uninstall Security Suite
- How to stop listening to bullshit and make your PC secure for real
- Google Maps mobile: why there is no updates for non-USA Android phones?
- Do not copy others, surpass them
- Antivir Solution pro – new rogue mimicking legitimate antivirus
- NDrive Contest : win free lifetime maps (ending 13.07.2010 )
- Global unlike: it does exit as MyWOT toolbar
- Avoid AV Security Suite infection!
- Marriage, the trip to Portugal and vacation
Tags
Android Antispyware Soft boonex browser chrome domains Egypt firefox google analytics Hootsuite hurghada IE Antivirus Intelinet jedit komodo edit mywot ndrive nexus one pandora software php php editor php editors Programming removers review Reviews rogue Security SEM spymaxx spyware spyware guard 2008 spywareremovers spywares spywaresweeperpro taxes Travel twitter virusheat VirusIsolator webdevelopment websites winAntivirus2008 Win AntiVirus 2008 wordpress
Recent Comments