I have read a very interesting post in webmasterworld about pros and const link buying
There are many oppinions. From the Search Engine point of view bought links skew the results when counted as they are not necessary relevant or “best” resources in terms of quality. However, the webmaster spend time (and money) to have them listed, thus the information should have at least some credability. Additionally, webmasters can “vote” for any site by linking to it.
I think that linking context is important and bought links should have less weight if they are not in context or not related to the original page content. Perhaps they have not be treated separatelly than other links, although I do not think that readers would follow links that are in the bottomline of the page often. So, in simple terms, bigger weight should have clearly seen page links with rich description. Site-wide, small-text links should be unrated/almost unrated. I think search industry is going in the same direction.
Search
Latests posts
- Yii framework
- Big malware players return during the autumn
- Which new Kindle would I choose?
- Kindle Fire will be announced on September 28
- Is malware payment gateway shutdown the end of Fake AVs?
- Upgrade to Ndrive 11 – my experience and review.
- Tracking Social behavior on websites: 6 things to implement right now
- Status progress: what I am working on now, February 2011
- Malware tactics : impersonating legitimate programs
- Palladium Pro – ThinkPoints successor in the wild
Tags
Android Antispyware Soft boonex browser chrome Egypt firefox frameworks google analytics Hootsuite IE Antivirus jedit kindle komodo edit malware mywot ndrive nexus one pandora software php php editor php editors Programming removers review Reviews rogue scam Security spymaxx spyware spywareremovers spywares spywaresweeperpro taxes thinkpoint Travel twitter virusheat VirusIsolator webdevelopment websites winAntivirus2008 Win AntiVirus 2008 wordpress
Recent Comments