<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop cursing PHP for your faults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majauskas.com/stop-cursing-php-for-your-faults/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majauskas.com/stop-cursing-php-for-your-faults</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giedrius</title>
		<link>http://www.majauskas.com/stop-cursing-php-for-your-faults#comment-5830</link>
		<dc:creator>Giedrius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majauskas.com/?p=224#comment-5830</guid>
		<description>I have checked Rails. I am not so sure I am ready to switch from PHP to rails now, but I like its implementation. Thats why I like &quot;stricter&quot; modular php frameworks like Cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have checked Rails. I am not so sure I am ready to switch from PHP to rails now, but I like its implementation. Thats why I like &#8220;stricter&#8221; modular php frameworks like Cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahad Bokhari</title>
		<link>http://www.majauskas.com/stop-cursing-php-for-your-faults#comment-5825</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahad Bokhari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majauskas.com/?p=224#comment-5825</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve all made our mistakes, but we learn from them and learn how to use the language to our benefits, not detriment.  You are right tho alot of people just keep on using the quick fix time and time again till everything breaks...At least they could comment on the code they write...

Separation, exaclty matey - i know you are a php guy but you should try Rails man, the syntax is quite easy to grasp and the MVC is a joy working with. Check these posts out for more insight:

http://andyjeffries.co.uk/articles/4-reasons-why-ruby-syntax-is-better-than-phps-  
http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html

Check the comments on the latter one, great read!  Always good to have different perspectives mate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve all made our mistakes, but we learn from them and learn how to use the language to our benefits, not detriment.  You are right tho alot of people just keep on using the quick fix time and time again till everything breaks&#8230;At least they could comment on the code they write&#8230;</p>
<p>Separation, exaclty matey &#8211; i know you are a php guy but you should try Rails man, the syntax is quite easy to grasp and the MVC is a joy working with. Check these posts out for more insight:</p>
<p><a href="http://andyjeffries.co.uk/articles/4-reasons-why-ruby-syntax-is-better-than-phps-" rel="nofollow">http://andyjeffries.co.uk/articles/4-reasons-why-ruby-syntax-is-better-than-phps-</a><br />
<a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html</a></p>
<p>Check the comments on the latter one, great read!  Always good to have different perspectives mate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
